Ayanna Pressley

Rank 2 of 47
|
Score 286

The statement by Milton addresses a public issue, specifically the handling of a death penalty case by Wesley Bell's office. It critiques Bell's actions in the context of his role as a public official and his campaign promises, thus contributing to civic dialogue on justice and political accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but expresses disappointment in a public official's actions, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on Bell's professional actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a perceived inconsistency between Bell's campaign promises and his actions, encouraging public scrutiny and accountability. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing specific actions of Bell's office without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By holding a public official accountable, the statement uses influence to potentially better society by advocating for justice and reform. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]