Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement by Milton addresses a public issue, specifically the handling of a death penalty case by Wesley Bell's office. It critiques Bell's actions in the context of his role as a public official and his campaign promises, thus contributing to civic dialogue on justice and political accountability.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but expresses disappointment in a public official's actions, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on Bell's professional actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a perceived inconsistency between Bell's campaign promises and his actions, encouraging public scrutiny and accountability. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing specific actions of Bell's office without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By holding a public official accountable, the statement uses influence to potentially better society by advocating for justice and reform. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.