Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Nefarious Filth Birdð“…¾
@sasquatch_god
·
109d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the performance and strategy of the Green Party in the context of U.S. politics, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, particularly towards those labeled as 'concern trolls.' The intent appears to be defending the Green Party's achievements while criticizing those who question its strategy.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. It uses dismissive and confrontational language, which can be harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and engages in a form of cyberbullying by labeling critics as 'concern trolls' and implying they support a 'corporate imperialist duopoly.'Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it creates division by attacking those with differing opinions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against those who question the Green Party's strategy. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.