The statement calls for a public figure, Jamie Raskin, to address the authenticity of a circulating video. It implies a need for transparency and accountability from a public office, which contributes to civic dialogue and public trust.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a request for clarification and transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and transparency by asking for clarification on the video's authenticity. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by requesting a response from Jamie Raskin's office without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote accountability and transparency, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by seeking factual information and accountability. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.