Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the economic impact of a significant drop in the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the political discourse surrounding it. It critiques both major political parties and presents a perspective on capitalism, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to intentionally cause harm, but its critical tone could be seen as divisive. It does not directly violate this principle but does not actively strive to do no harm either.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques political ideologies and economic systems rather than individuals, thus respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critiquing and pointing out flaws rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of political parties and economic systems but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It remains focused on the issues rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and addresses a significant public issue. However, its tone could be more responsible and constructive to foster better civic dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.