Patrick Burgerman
@imaMFbird
·
469d
The statement in question, 'I have, and will update as more comes in. It’s not exactly a no-fly list, it’s a surveillance program. Physically following people on this scale is a tremendous expenditure of resources,' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to surveillance and civil liberties. The tone is informative and aims to clarify a misconception about a surveillance program. The intent appears to be to inform and update the public on an ongoing issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is factual and aims to clarify a point, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the issue rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing information about the nature of the surveillance program, which can foster empathy and compassion for those affected. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a public concern without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing factual information and updates on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.