Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to immigration policies and the positions of public figures on these matters. The tone is critical and accusatory, focusing on past positions and actions of Harris and Walz.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses charged language and comparisons that could be harmful or inflammatory. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it includes potentially defamatory comparisons and accusations. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and lacks a constructive tone. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly; it makes serious accusations without providing context or evidence. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.