The statement by @butters43, which is a response to a conversation about journalistic coverage of Donald Trump's actions, touches on the role of journalists in covering underreported or unpopular subjects. The statement suggests that when a topic is widely covered by corporate media, it becomes less interesting to the speaker as a reporter, and implies that the public benefits more from coverage of less popular or taboo subjects.
- The statement aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm by suggesting that journalists should focus on underreported issues, which can bring attention to important but overlooked topics. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by advocating for the coverage of unpopular or taboo subjects, which can help inform the public about diverse issues. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by explaining a rationale for focusing on less covered topics, rather than attacking others for their coverage choices. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to suggest a journalistic approach that could benefit society by highlighting underreported issues. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.