Matt Taibbi

Rank 30 of 47

Score -12

Coverage of Trump isn’t about getting info out. No one wants me to write about J6 because they actually expect I’ll develop new information (which pours out of enforcement agencies in bulk). They just want me to show support for the cause, and that’s not my job — fuck that.

some dude

@butters43

469d

@JJ_Blue_ @mtaibbi I think Matt’s response to this is that there are a bunch of journalists reporting on this topic so why should he compete with them when there are plenty of other alarming things that no one else is reporting on?

8/7/2024, 12:31:25 AM

The statement by @mtaibbi constitutes public discourse as it engages with the topic of media coverage and the role of journalists in reporting on significant political events, specifically the January 6th Capitol riot and former President Donald Trump. The statement expresses frustration with the expectation that journalists should show support for a cause rather than focus on uncovering new information. The tone is defiant and critical, emphasizing journalistic integrity over advocacy.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by emphasizing the importance of journalistic integrity and the dissemination of new information rather than merely supporting a cause. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. However, the use of profanity ('fuck that') could be seen as disrespectful and detracts from the overall tone of respect. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the role of journalists in providing new information and not just supporting causes. It encourages a more nuanced view of media coverage. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the expectations placed on journalists and the importance of their role in society. However, the use of profanity could be seen as a minor violation of this principle.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses the platform to advocate for the betterment of society by emphasizing the importance of journalistic integrity and the need for new information rather than mere advocacy. [+1]