The statement engages in a discussion about the nature of a coup and whether the events of January 6, 2021, in the United States qualify as such. The tone is somewhat dismissive and condescending, particularly with the remark about ten-year-olds in South America. The intent appears to be to correct what the author perceives as a misunderstanding of what constitutes a coup.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive and condescending, which might alienate or offend some readers. This could be considered a minor violation of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the condescending tone could be seen as disrespectful to those who hold a different view. This is a minor violation of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the views of others in a somewhat condescending manner. This is a minor violation of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it dismisses the opposing view without engaging in a meaningful discussion. This is a minor violation of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.