Alexandria Seaborne
@aseaborne
·
504d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the selection of political figures and the influence of identity and affiliations in political decisions. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat defensive, aiming to clarify a point about political dynamics and affiliations.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply a critique of political decisions, which can be seen as a neutral action. No harm is evident.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on clarifying a political stance and defending a viewpoint.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue and criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a level of respect in the discourse. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, engaging in a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.