Matt Lehman
@MatthewDLehman
·
504d
The statement engages in a discussion about political choices and public figures, specifically addressing the selection of Walz as a VP candidate and the reactions from different political groups. This constitutes public discourse as it involves substantive engagement with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It expresses an opinion without using harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by addressing the 'noise' from the right and expressing an understanding of why Democrats might be happy with Walz. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by contributing to a political discussion without resorting to harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.