Don Lemon

Rank 31 of 47
|
Score 6

The statement appears to be a provocative and sensationalized comment about Vice President Kamala Harris's interaction with Michigan protesters. The use of the word 'DEMOLISHED' suggests a confrontational and possibly aggressive tone. The inclusion of an emoji and a link to a website further indicates an attempt to draw attention and possibly incite strong reactions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement's aggressive tone and use of the word 'DEMOLISHED' could be seen as harmful, as it may incite further conflict or hostility. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not directly engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the aggressive tone could contribute to a hostile environment. This is a minor violation of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to encourage a divisive and confrontational attitude. This is a significant violation of promoting positive discourse. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a sensationalized and confrontational tone, which can be seen as a form of personal attack. This is a significant violation of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly and with integrity. The sensationalized and provocative nature of the statement can contribute to a toxic public discourse. This is a significant violation of using one's platform responsibly. [-2]