Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by the Green candidate constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to political strategy and voter engagement. The tone is somewhat confrontational and defensive, aiming to correct what the speaker perceives as misinformation or lack of awareness about the Green Party's efforts.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the confrontational tone could be seen as dismissive or alienating to some. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion effectively. It is more focused on correcting and defending rather than fostering a constructive dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism but does so in a confrontational manner. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Neutral.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue, though the tone could be more responsible and constructive. Minor alignment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.