Matt Taibbi

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 41
8/9/2024, 3:57:48 PM
X
In reply to:
Phoeli𝕏
@sunmynd
·
470d
@mtaibbi Deliberately attempting to subvert an election is not a free speech issue.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
470d
The reader-added context here is wrong. Walz specifically says there’s no constitutional protection for “hate speech,” which is legal in the US. Even amid discussion of banned election speech, it’s incorrect to say there’s “no constitutional protection” for misinformation.
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
·
472d
That Tim Walz falsely believes the free speech guarantee doesn't include what he considers to be 'misinformation' or 'hate speech' will bother almost no Dem supporters, since the vast majority of them want the state to be empowered to censor dissent.

The statement by @sunmynd, 'The exceptions to the First Amendment even with election-related speech are extremely narrow. Not sure what you mean by “subvert,”' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the First Amendment and its implications for election-related speech. The tone is inquisitive and seeks clarification, indicating a willingness to engage in dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is neutral and seeks clarification, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification on the term 'subvert,' which can lead to a more informed discussion. This aligns with promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for clarification rather than making personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. This aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by discussing the narrow exceptions to the First Amendment and seeking to understand the context better. This aligns with using the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]