Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the concerns surrounding Project 2025 and the actions of the Heritage Foundation. The tone is critical and somewhat alarmist, using terms like 'super creepy' and 'even creepier' to describe the plan and its undisclosed elements. The intent appears to be to raise awareness and prompt action regarding the transparency of the project.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful due to its alarmist language, which might incite fear or panic. This could be considered a minor violation of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and transparency regarding a public issue, which aligns with the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by calling for the release of the plan and a meeting to discuss it, rather than resorting to personal attacks. This aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to raise awareness about a public issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. This aligns with the principle of using influence responsibly. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.