Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and conversation critique the New York Times for not covering significant events related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, while focusing on less critical stories. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived media bias or neglect.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as critical of the media's choices, which is a form of constructive criticism.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals, focusing on media coverage rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by drawing attention to underreported issues. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight issues that the author believes are important for societal awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by critiquing media coverage responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.