Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Ken Klippenstein 📎
@kenklippenstein
·
336d
The statement critiques Vice President Kamala Harris's engagement with substantive issues, specifically in the context of the Biden administration's decision to release $3.5 billion to Israel for US weapons. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and dismissive, suggesting that Harris has not engaged with many substantive issues beyond this one.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a sarcastic tone that could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the dignity of a public figure in a somewhat dismissive manner. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and sarcastic. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it leans towards a personal attack on Kamala Harris's engagement with substantive issues. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity due to its sarcastic tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.