Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 41

The statement 'No, they were brilliant, flawed people. They created something powerful, inspirational, and durable, and had the humility to build a mechanism for future generations to overrule them.' constitutes public discourse as it engages with the historical evaluation of the Founding Fathers and their contributions to the framework of governance, which is a substantive public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and acknowledges the complexity of the Founding Fathers, thus striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by recognizing both the achievements and flaws of the Founding Fathers, fostering a balanced view. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the criticisms of the Founding Fathers without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing thoughtfully to the discussion on historical figures and their legacies. [+1]