Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement criticizes Kamala Harris and Joe Biden for allegedly providing contradictory actions regarding a ceasefire and military aid to Israel. The tone is accusatory and suggests dishonesty on the part of the officials. The accompanying image and conversation provide context to the criticism, highlighting the release of funds for military equipment to Israel.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to hold public officials accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by promoting transparency. However, the accusatory tone and use of the word 'LYING' could be seen as harmful and inflammatory.Ā [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals it criticizes, as it directly accuses them of lying without providing substantial evidence. This could be seen as a form of harassment.Ā [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and distrust.Ā [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks by accusing Kamala Harris of lying, rather than focusing on constructive criticism or dialogue about the policy issues at hand.Ā [-2]