The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by discussing the implications of surveillance and the reliability of information sources. The tone is critical and questioning, aiming to highlight concerns about domestic surveillance and the role of major information platforms like Google.
- The statement and conversation strive to do no harm by focusing on public issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation respects the privacy and dignity of others by discussing public figures and issues without engaging in cyberbullying or harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by raising awareness about potential overreach in surveillance and the need for reliable information. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation engages in constructive criticism of Google and the surveillance practices, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the issues. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about important societal issues, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.