Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue related to government spending and the actions of the Secret Service, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived misuse of funds and lack of accountability.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but uses sarcasm to criticize government actions, which could be seen as a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of government spending issues but does so in a sarcastic manner, which may not foster empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the Secret Service and Treasury but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to highlight issues of public concern, aiming for the betterment of society by calling attention to government accountability. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss public issues, though the sarcastic tone may detract from its integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.