The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with a substantive public issue, specifically the role and actions of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The tone is critical and suggests that the DHS, originally intended to combat foreign terrorism, now views American citizens, particularly those concerned with budgetary issues, as threats. The image reinforces this message by depicting the DHS as a surveillance entity. The statement and image touch upon several principles, including the potential for harm, respect for privacy, and the promotion of understanding and empathy.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by fostering distrust and fear towards a government institution, which may not be constructive. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals but criticizes a public institution, which is a legitimate target for public discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy; instead, it takes a critical stance without offering constructive solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the DHS but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.