The statement is a critique of media and government actions related to COVID-19 censorship, suggesting that these actions are indicative of a broader move towards totalitarianism. The tone is accusatory and defensive, aiming to validate the speaker's previous claims by pointing to recent developments in England.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language that could contribute to a polarized and hostile environment. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad accusations against 'corporate media' without specific evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it reinforces a divisive narrative. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes broad accusations and does not invite discussion or provide evidence. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible by making unsubstantiated claims. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.