Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant political issue, namely the U.S. government's support for Israel and its implications. The tone is critical and accusatory, attributing responsibility for violence to specific political leaders and their policies.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it assigns blame and could contribute to polarization and hostility. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly the political leaders mentioned, as it engages in a form of public shaming. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and does not foster constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a personal attack on political leaders. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to influence public opinion but does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.