Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 41
8/12/2024, 1:49:12 AM
X
In reply to:
Awakened American Dragon
@Bell524Bell
·
469d
@mtaibbi So the records case and the refusal to charge because of mental health makes the case for the 25th?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
469d
Okay, I was actually assigned a story years ago about whether or not Donald Trump could be removed under the 25th Amendment, and after speaking to a number of lawyers and historians (in addition to the psychiatrists who started a petition to remove him) I learned that the…
Corpulace
@CorpulaceChris
·
470d
@mtaibbi You refuse to say word one about Trump and his nonsensical word salad speeches because you are scared to death to lose you're MAGA fans. These are your people. You keep trying to distance yourself from the tattoo on the forehead Trump fanatics but these are your people

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the mental fitness of political figures, specifically Donald Trump and Joe Biden, and whether they can or should be removed from office under the 25th Amendment. This discussion touches on public issues related to political leadership, mental health, and the mechanisms for removing a sitting president, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is part of a conversation that includes potentially harmful language ('Dipshit').
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement itself does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is part of a thread that includes derogatory language. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on making a point about political fitness.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments directly, but it is part of a thread that includes such behavior.
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and engages in a public debate about political fitness, but it is part of a thread that includes irresponsible language.