Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 28

The statement by @mtaibbi constitutes public discourse as it engages with the issue of shadow banning, censorship, and free speech on social media platforms. The tone is defensive and critical, aiming to highlight perceived injustices in social media practices and policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but uses a confrontational tone ('your argument is stupid') which could be seen as harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of 'stupid' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticizing the opposing view. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks by calling the argument 'stupid,' which is an ad hominem argument rather than constructive criticism. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by discussing censorship and shadow banning, but the confrontational tone may undermine responsible use of the platform. [+1]