Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement critiques Vice President Kamala Harris' stance on immigration and her campaign promises, referencing a specific conversation and linking to a website for further context. It engages with public issues, specifically immigration policy and political accountability, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as critical of Harris' consistency in her policy stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on political critique. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on highlighting perceived inconsistencies.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived contradiction in Harris' statements. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to hold a public figure accountable, which is a responsible use of influence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.