Britney Mathis
@BritMathis912
·
470d
The statement by @mtaibbi constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about media practices, journalistic integrity, and the role of public figures in media. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived inconsistencies in media hiring practices and the qualifications of individuals who are given platforms to speak on public issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize public figures.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to critique media practices. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.