The statement critiques Kamala Harris for not having a policy platform on her website and contrasts this with Jill Stein's platform. It questions whether Harris's platform is influenced by billionaire backers, implying a lack of transparency or integrity. The tone is critical and somewhat accusatory, aiming to promote Jill Stein's platform while casting doubt on Harris's motivations.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies negative intentions about Kamala Harris, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement questions the integrity of Kamala Harris, which could be seen as disrespectful to her dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of Jill Stein's platform but does so by casting doubt on Kamala Harris's integrity, which does not foster empathy or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a way that could be seen as a personal attack on Kamala Harris's integrity. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to promote Jill Stein's campaign, which could be seen as using influence for a specific political agenda. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as lacking in integrity due to the accusatory tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.