The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to media integrity, corporate influence, and political interests. The tone is critical and aims to mobilize support for a political agenda that includes breaking up media conglomerates.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that mainstream media is harmful, which could be seen as a form of criticism rather than harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes institutions rather than individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the speaker's perspective on media integrity but does not explicitly foster empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on institutional critique rather than individual blame.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for a policy change that they believe will benefit society by protecting the truth from corporate and political interests.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss a significant public issue responsibly.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.