Patti Politics 🇵🇸
@impattipolitics
·
347d
The statement 'Aww, good times! #VoteGreen' in response to a conversation about disrupting the DNC and a rally against U.S. funding of the Israeli war machine constitutes public discourse. It engages with public issues, specifically political activism and foreign policy.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as trivializing serious issues, which might indirectly cause harm by not taking the gravity of the situation seriously. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is lighthearted in tone, which may not be appropriate given the serious context. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a lighthearted comment that does not contribute to meaningful discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society. It trivializes a serious issue. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly given the context. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.