The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the actions of public figures (Kamala Harris, Steve Mnuchin, and Donald Trump) and their implications for corruption in Washington. It also calls for civic action by encouraging voting, which contributes to public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm with words and actions, but it does imply wrongdoing without providing detailed evidence, which could be seen as harmful if the accusations are unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make serious accusations against public figures, which could impact their dignity if not substantiated.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and focuses on alleged corruption. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes accusations without inviting discussion or providing a balanced view. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to encourage voting, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by addressing corruption. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but must be careful to use the platform responsibly by ensuring accusations are well-founded and not misleading.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.