The Boston Globe
@BostonGlobe
·
358d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue—pension protection—and attributes the action to a specific political group, thereby contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It focuses on a positive outcome (pension protection). [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the protection of pensions, which is a compassionate action. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those in disagreement. It makes a partisan claim that only Democrats were responsible, which could be seen as dismissive of other viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a positive societal change, which aligns with the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to inform the public about a significant policy outcome. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.