Jill Stien

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -50

The statement 'BREAKING: Kamala Harris’ economic policy is being written by BLACKROCK' appears to be a provocative claim about a public figure and a major financial institution. It suggests a significant influence of a private entity on public policy, which is a matter of public concern and thus constitutes public discourse. The tone is sensational and potentially accusatory, aiming to draw attention and possibly incite a reaction.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its sensational nature could contribute to misinformation or unwarranted suspicion, which can be harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by making an unverified claim. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems designed to provoke and possibly mislead. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a bold claim without providing evidence or context, which can be seen as a form of personal attack or ad hominem argument. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a potentially irresponsible manner by making an unverified and sensational claim. [-1]