Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement 'Did you forget about Rachel Corrie? I didn’t.' accompanied by the image of a woman speaking to a person in a blue helmet, likely refers to a historical or political event involving Rachel Corrie. The tone of the statement suggests a reminder or a call to remember an individual and their actions or legacy. The intent appears to be to evoke memory and possibly to prompt reflection or action regarding the issues associated with Rachel Corrie. The content is brief but implies a deeper context that the audience is expected to understand or research further.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a reminder of a person and their actions, which can be seen as a neutral or positive act depending on the context. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Rachel Corrie by acknowledging her and her actions. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging the audience to remember Rachel Corrie and possibly reflect on her actions and their implications. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a straightforward reminder. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to remind the audience of Rachel Corrie, which can be seen as an attempt to contribute to the betterment of society by promoting memory and reflection on important issues. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.