Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the integrity of a political figure's past campaign claims, which is relevant to public discourse. The tone is factual and aims to inform the public about a discrepancy in a political figure's past statements.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could harm the reputation of Tim Walz. However, it is presented as a factual report, which is a necessary part of public accountability. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on public records and campaign statements rather than personal attacks or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting a factual discrepancy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not address any mistakes made by the author, so this principle is not applicable.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its influence to inform the public about a potential issue of integrity in a political campaign, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing a link to a credible source for further information. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.