The statement and the associated conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a debate about media bias, political rhetoric, and the nature of public discourse itself. The tone of the statement is accusatory and critical, suggesting that the person being addressed is failing to maintain fairness and balance in their commentary. The inclusion of the tweet by David Plouffe adds a layer of critique about the nature of political attacks and the perceived double standards in addressing them.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is accusatory and dismissive, which can contribute to a hostile environment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in a personal attack on the individual’s character and actions. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on criticizing and condemning the individual. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is more of a personal attack rather than a reasoned argument. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.