Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the topic of peace candidates in the context of a political election. It references a conversation about the viability of peace as a political platform and critiques the current political landscape.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a political opinion about candidates and their platforms.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on public figures and their political stances rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by contributing to the discussion about peace candidates and their viability. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political system and candidates, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for a political candidate and a specific issue (peace), which can be seen as an attempt to influence society positively. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.