Jill Stien

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -104

The statement 'Fixed it. #SteinWare2024' along with the altered image of Kamala Harris's campaign poster constitutes public discourse as it engages with political commentary and critique. The statement and image suggest a preference for an alternative candidate (SteinWare) over Kamala Harris, implying a critique of her candidacy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative critique of Kamala Harris's candidacy, which is a common aspect of political discourse.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but may be seen as undermining the dignity of Kamala Harris by altering her campaign poster to support another candidate.Ā [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a straightforward critique without constructive dialogue.Ā [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a simple expression of preference for another candidate without explanation or discussion.Ā [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to support an alternative candidate, which is a legitimate use of free speech in political discourse.Ā [+1]