Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the economic agenda of a prominent political figure, Kamala Harris, and its potential impact on Wall Street. The tone is somewhat alarmist and critical, suggesting a negative view of Harris's policies.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a tone that could incite fear or concern among readers, which may indirectly cause harm by spreading anxiety. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the dignity of Kamala Harris by framing her policies in a negative light without substantive discussion. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a critical tone that may polarize readers. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion or providing a balanced perspective. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly by failing to provide a nuanced or balanced analysis. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.