Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political strategies and policies related to a ceasefire and arms embargo, specifically in the context of U.S. politics and its relationship with Israel. The tone is critical and somewhat accusatory towards the Democratic Party, suggesting they are influenced by AIPAC and unlikely to take the proposed actions.
- The statement aims to promote a ceasefire and arms embargo, which could be seen as striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone towards the Democrats may not fully align with this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the accusatory tone towards the Democrats could be seen as lacking respect for their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the cause of a ceasefire and arms embargo, but the critical tone towards the Democrats may undermine this effort.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Democrats but does so in a way that could be perceived as a personal attack, particularly with the mention of AIPAC. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for a policy change that the speaker believes would better society, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.