Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Patti Politics 🇵🇸
@impattipolitics
·
527d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a political discussion, comparing the intellect and maturity of Jill Stein and Butch Ware to other political figures and suggesting they would perform better in a debate. The tone is critical of both major political parties and their representatives, while promoting the Green Party candidates.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it disparages the intellect and maturity of Republicans and Democrats, as well as specific individuals (Kennedy, Harris, Trump, and their VPs). This could be seen as harmful and disrespectful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in negative comparisons and personal attacks on public figures. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division by making derogatory comparisons. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than focusing on policy differences or constructive debate. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.