Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -114
Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
8/19/2024, 1:05:13 AM
X

The statement 'Shut down the DNC!' along with the context of protesters marching through Chicago with a banner that reads 'Free Palestine' constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates, specifically political party actions and international human rights concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement 'Shut down the DNC!' is aggressive and could be seen as harmful, potentially inciting anger or violence. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not directly engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the aggressive tone could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of others, particularly those associated with the DNC. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is confrontational and does not seek to bridge divides or foster dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a direct attack on the DNC without providing reasons or engaging in a discussion. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to call for a significant action ('Shut down the DNC!'), but it is not clear if this is for the betterment of society. The aggressive tone suggests it may not be constructive. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech, but the responsibility and integrity of using the platform are questionable due to the aggressive and confrontational nature of the message.