Jill Stien

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the accusation of genocide and the political actions related to it. The tone is urgent and accusatory, aiming to mobilize public opinion and action against perceived injustices.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly the use of the term 'genocide' which is a severe accusation. This could incite strong emotions and potentially harmful actions. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the accusatory tone could be seen as disrespectful to those who hold different political views. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding and action against perceived injustice, but the accusatory tone may hinder empathy and compassion towards those with differing views.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a strong accusation without providing a platform for discussion or understanding opposing views. [-2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to mobilize action against perceived injustice, which can be seen as an attempt to better society, but the divisive language may undermine this goal. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech but the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be questioned due to the accusatory and potentially inflammatory language.