Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public figures and political campaigns, which are substantive public issues. The tone appears critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to critique the involvement of Hillary Clinton in Kamala Harris's campaign and suggesting that it is regressive.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive and potentially harmful to the individuals mentioned. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of the individuals involved due to its sarcastic tone. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it is critical and sarcastic. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a dismissive tone and does not provide a substantive argument or engage with opposing views constructively. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its dismissive and sarcastic tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.