Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Chester Todd
@ChesterToddWI
·
528d
The statement is a response to a public issue involving a lawsuit related to an election, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, and the intent appears to be to criticize the opposing political party and their actions.
- The statement uses inflammatory language such as 'DemocRATS' and 'genocide,' which can be harmful and divisive, violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in derogatory name-calling and makes a severe accusation of 'genocide,' which disrespects the dignity of others and can be considered a form of hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and animosity. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, such as calling the opposing party 'DemocRATS.'Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so irresponsibly by using inflammatory and accusatory language, which undermines the integrity of the discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.