Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
527d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to election laws and political party dynamics. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that the Democratic Party manipulated COVID-19 circumstances to change laws in New York to their advantage.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it accuses a political party of unethical behavior without providing evidence, which can contribute to public mistrust and polarization. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in a form of political attack that could be seen as a form of harassment or cyberbullying. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and divisive. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a broad accusation without engaging in a reasoned argument or providing evidence. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it makes serious accusations without substantiation. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.