Reposted by Cornel West
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the critique of political figures and the political system.
- The statement uses strong language ('shame on you,' 'deserves indictment') which could be seen as harmful, but it does not contain explicit threats or incitement to violence. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques public figures in their professional capacity. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more accusatory and critical. Violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions. It also uses personal attacks ('Gangster Trump'). Significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible due to its accusatory tone. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.