The statement involves a discussion about a public figure's stance on a significant policy issue (fracking) and their public communication (or lack thereof) on the matter. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does press for accountability, which can be seen as a neutral to positive action.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity as it focuses on public statements and actions of a public figure, not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does seek clarity and accountability, which can indirectly contribute to a more informed public.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the public figure's actions and statements without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by seeking to hold a public figure accountable for their public statements and actions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.