Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement critiques the Democratic convention, suggesting that the speakers have not contributed anything new or valuable to the campaign. It also introduces a personal rule about political communication, implying that repeating known information does not move people or change their opinions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a critique of the event's effectiveness rather than a personal attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critiquing the event.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the event rather than personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to express a viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.